The Collaborative Trajectory Analysis Project (cTAP), a public-private partnership to accelerate data science solutions to critical problems in drug development for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), today announced the publication of two research studies with important implications for the design of effective clinical trials.
All patients with Duchenne eventually lose the ability to walk, but the rate at which ambulatory function declines can vary greatly between patients. This variability can cloud interpretation of clinical trials making it difficult to discern whether or not a drug is effective. The published studies announced here explain approximately half of the variability in disease progression in Duchenne, more than double that explained previously with conventional analyses.
“Without this understanding of the natural clinical progression of the various genetic causes for DMD, it would be extremely difficult to design the clinical trials or choose the appropriate endpoints necessary to develop novel drugs to use for DMD,” said Dr. Edward Kaye, President, CEO and Chief Medical Officer of Sarepta Therapeutics. “cTAP is one of the best examples of international academic collaboration that has advanced the clinical understanding of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.”
cTAP has connected leading clinical experts in Duchenne, drug developers and analytical experts with the shared goal of improving clinical trials in Duchenne by learning from patient data. The two published studies used statistical methods to quantify and predict disease progression in Duchenne, drawing from a growing database of more than 1,000 boys with Duchenne that, in total, includes functional assessments at more than 10,000 clinic visits.
Professor Eugenio Mercuri, a world-leading expert in Duchenne at the Pediatric Neurology at the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, pioneered the collaborative access to registry data in Duchenne that made these studies possible. “As a first step, we wanted to quantify the different rates of disease progression in different patients,” said Mercuri. Published in the September issue of Neuromuscular Disorders, the study by Mercuri and his colleagues identified statistically distinct groups of patients who had similar trajectories of ambulatory function over time; classifying patients into these groups explained more than half of the variability in trajectories of disease progression.
Building on these findings, a second study led by Duchenne expert Professor Nathalie Goemans, head of the Neuromuscular Reference Center for Children at the University Hospitals in Leuven, Belgium, was published in the October 18 issue of PLoS One. Goemans and her colleagues developed a prediction model for one-year changes in ambulatory function using a composite of patient characteristics and functional measures. The prediction model explained more than twice as much variability in ambulatory outcomes compared to patient measures that have been used to define eligibility for Duchenne clinical trials.
Both studies were conducted through cTAP and in scientific partnership with Dr. James Signorovitch, Vice President and outcomes research expert, and a team of researchers and data scientists at Analysis Group, Inc.